Case Filings Alert™

Case Filings Alert™ reports on new cases filed in courts around the country, alerting you to significant new cases at the beginning of the litigation process, long before the case is settled or a decision handed down.  For each case reported on, the full complaint and docket information are included, so you will be able to follow the case as it works its way through the litigation process and obtain documents filed in the case.

Case Filings Alert covers a wide range of civil litigation subjects including: antitrust/unfair trade, constitution, consumer fraud, cybersecurity, data privacy, environment, intellectual property, labor & employment, personal injury/product liability, securities, among others. 

Editor: Robert S. Want (rwant@CaseFilingsAlert.com). Copyright © 2024 WANT Publishing Co. Other services include NationsCourts.com (comprehensive guide to the nation’s federal, state, and county courts), MDLCases.com (introduction to multidistrict litigation, and listing of pending MDL cases), and LegalEditor.com (editing, writing and proofreading services).

November 21, 2024 – Product Liability
IVF Lawsuit Filed Over CooperSurgical Embryo Culture Media
Fertility company CooperSurgical faces a proposed class action filed in San Francisco federal court seeking to represent couples whose hopes for an IVF pregnancy were dashed when the company was forced to recall its Lifeglobal embryo culture media, because it was destroying fertilized eggs instead of causing them to grow as intended.

During in vitro fertilization (IVF), according to the complaint, healthcare professionals remove a woman’s eggs and fertilize them with sperm. The eggs are then implanted back into the woman’s uterus to be carried to term. The entire IVF process can take months or years, and can cost tens of thousands of dollars, the complaint says.

Late in 2023, CooperSurgical announced a LifeGlobal IVF culture media recall, after discovering that the product was defective. But since the company only notified retailers and distributors about the recall, the complaint says, a number of couples who incurred the financial and emotional costs associated with failed fertility treatment only belatedly learned that defective culture media may be responsible for their lost embryos.

November 20, 2024 – Antitrust
StubHub Inflated Ticket Prices With Deceptive Fees, Lawsuit Alleges
The attorney general for Washington, D.C., has sued ticket reseller StubHub, accusing the platform of advertising deceptively low fees and then inflating prices with extra charges.

This practice, known as “drip pricing,” violates antitrust and consumer protection laws, according to the lawsuit filed in D.C. Superior Court. “StubHub intentionally hides the true price to boost profits at its customers’ expense,” the suit alleges, noting that the company used to advertise the “all-in” cost of a ticket but changed after finding that people are more likely to buy tickets at higher prices with the “drip pricing.”

The suit claims that StubHub hides mandatory “fulfillment and service” fees until the end of a lengthy online purchasing process that often requires more than a dozen pages to complete as a countdown timer creates a sense of urgency. This makes it “nearly impossible” for buyers to know the true cost of a ticket and compare to find the best price, the suit says.

November 19, 2024 – Privacy
Facebook Accused of Illegally Capturing Streaming Data for Targeted Ads
A proposed class action filed in San Francisco federal court alleges Facebook parent company Meta Platforms has, without consent, intercepted the sensitive and confidential communications of Paramount+, ESPN+, Hulu, and Starz subscribers with Facebook accounts while intentionally “obfuscating” how much and what kind of data it captures.

The lawsuit accuses Facebook of using its business advertising and metrics tools, facilitated primarily by the Facebook tracking pixel, to secretly intercept sensitive, confidential user communications. In particular, according to the complaint, Facebook can use its tracking pixel to match a streaming subscriber to their individual Facebook profile each time they access a website containing the pixel, such as those of Paramount+ and other streaming services. 

Plaintiffs say in their suit that the streaming services at issue are among the largest in the country and spend millions annually on targeted Facebook advertisements. Given the scale and persistence of the data it collects from the streamers, plaintiffs contend, Facebook knows the streaming services disclose their users’ personally identifiable information, even though the services have no lawful right to do so and are in violation of the Video Privacy Protection Act.

November 18, 2024 – Cybersecurity
Rite Aid Data Breach Suit Claims 2.2 Million People Impacted by Cyberattack
Rite Aid has been hit with a proposed class action over a 2024 data breach during which the sensitive personal information of roughly 2.2 million people was allegedly stolen.

The lawsuit, filed in Philadelphia federal court, says Rite Aid detected the cybersecurity incident on June 6, 2024, reportedly 12 hours after hackers had accessed its systems using employee credentials. Yet the company failed to notify those affected by the breach in a timely fashion. Plaintiff argues in her suit that the Aid data breach stemmed from the company’s failure to implement reasonable and appropriate cybersecurity measures to protect against “the foreseeable threat of a cyberattack.”

Plaintiff also asserts that Rite Aid’s internal investigation of the incident has not disclosed whether those responsible for the breach have been identified, whether the stolen data was held for ransom, how the breach was discovered, the mechanism of the attack, or what steps the company has taken to protect its systems in the wake of the incident.

November 15, 2024 – Intellectual Property
X Corp Faces Lawsuit from PR Firm over ‘X’ Trademark
In San Francisco federal court, Elon Musk’s X social media platform has been accused of violating the trademark rights of PR firm Multiply.

According to the complaint, X (formerly known as Twitter) causes consumer confusion by using the “X” trademark for social media marketing services that compete with that of plaintiff.

Plaintiff Multiply says it adopted “X” branding in 2019 and owns a federal trademark covering its “X” logo, noting that it created social media ad campaigns for drink brands including Arizona, Corona, and Liquid Death. The Twitter rebrand, Multiply claims, has already confused some of its existing and prospective clients, many of which overlap with X Corp’s.

November 14, 2024 – Consumer Fraud
Eggland’s Best Egg-Producing Hens Are Not Cage-Free as Advertised, Lawsuit Alleges
A proposed class action lawsuit alleges Eggland’s Best has falsely advertised its eggs as “cage-free,” given that most of the hens that produce the eggs live in “typical factory farming conditions” and never have outdoor access, alleges a proposed class action filed in Chicago federal court.

Many of the hens that produce the company’s purportedly cage-free eggs are housed “indoors 24 hours per day, 365 days per year,” in windowless structures made of concrete, metal, and dirt, according to the complaint. These structures, the complaint says, contain “hundreds of thousands of hens” packed so closely together that each bird has roughly one square foot of space, or less, to itself.

In their lawsuit, plaintiffs argue that by labeling the eggs with the claims “free to roam” and “natural,” Eggland’s Best has sought to attract consumers who specifically seek eggs from hens living in ethical, sustainable environments. Plaintiffs accuse the company of reaping an “unearned premium” by overcharging consumers for the supposedly cage-free eggs.

November 13, 2024 – Securities
SEC Charges Activist Short-Seller in $20 Million Fraud Scheme
The U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission has filed a civil action against activist short seller Andrew Left and his firm, Citron Capital LLC, for engaging in a $20 million “bait-and-switch” scheme to defraud followers by publishing false and misleading statements regarding his supposed stock trading recommendations.

In Los Angeles federal court, the SEC alleges that Left used his Citron Research website and related social media platforms to publicly recommend taking long or short positions in multiple companies and held out the positions as consistent with his own and Citron Capital’s positions. Following Left’s recommendations, the complaint says, the price of the target stocks moved more than 12 percent on average.

The SEC asserts in its complaint that once the recommendations were issued and the stocks moved, Left and Citron Capital quickly reversed their positions to capitalize on the stock price movements. As a consequence, the complaint says, Left bought back stock immediately after telling his readers to sell and sold stock immediately after telling his readers to buy.

November 12, 2024 – Product Liability
General Mills Named in Cocoa Puffs Toxic Lead Lawsuit
General Mills faces a proposed class action alleging that its popular Cocoa Puffs cereal contains levels of lead that exceed safety limits, putting children and other consumers at risk of lead poisoning.

Lead is a toxic heavy metal that can cause permanent brain damage, nervous system injuries, cognitive impairment, physical disabilities, or other long-term health consequences, according to the complaint filed in San Francisco federal court. Children are particularly vulnerable to lead exposure, the complaint says, as they are still developing and do not usually show exposure signs or symptoms.

In his lawsuit, plaintiff asserts that independent laboratory testing has revealed that one cup (36 grams) of Cocoa Puff contains .432 micrograms (mcg) of lead. California regulations set a .5 mcg per day limit on lead. While the amount of lead in Cocoa Puff cereal was just below .5 mcg, plaintiff points out that most consumers eat far more than one cup per serving and thus are typically exposed to anywhere from .532 mcg to .996 mcg of lead per bowl of cereal.

November 11, 2024 – Intellectual Property
Skechers Sues LL Bean for Copying Shoe Design
In a lawsuit filed in Manhattan federal court, clothing and outdoor gear company LL Bean is accused by footwear maker Skechers USA of copying its popular shoe designs.

According to the complaint, defendant LL Bean’s Freeport casual shoes infringe on two Skecher-patented designs for “heel cups” that surround the back of the foot. Skechers is the world’s third-largest footwear company.

Skechers in its suit called its designs “unique and eye-catching” because they use “graceful, sweeping, gently rolling lines and slopes” resembling the shape of a heel. “Only after Skechers incurred the substantial risk and monumental expense of developing and promoting its shoes with these heel cup designs, and established that they had broad appeal, did LL Bean enter the market with its infringing shoe,” Skechers claims.

 November 7, 2024 – Product Liability
Target Pressure Cooker Said to Cause Severe Burns From Instant Pot Explosion
A lawsuit alleges safety features on an Instant Pot pressure cooker sold by Target Corp. failed to prevent burn injuries caused by a defective float switch that allowed removal of the lid while the contents were still pressurized.

In her suit filed in Minnesota federal court, the plaintiff claims that she purchased an Instant Pot pressure cooker from Target that was defectively designed and unreasonably dangerous, containing safety features that failed to prevent the lid from being removed before all pressure was released, causing an explosion that left her with severe burns.

According to the complaint, plaintiff was using an Instant Pot Duo Crisp when the device allowed her to rotate and open the pressure cooker’s lid, even though there was still built-up pressure inside the pot. This malfunction, the complaint says, caused the pressure cooker to explode, forcefully ejecting the scalding contents all over plaintiff’s body, resulting in serious and substantial burn injuries.

November 6, 2024 – Constitution
Religious Group Seeks to Block Louisiana Law Requiring Public Schools to Display Ten Commandments
A multi-faith group has filed suit to block a new Louisiana state law requiring all public elementary, secondary, and postsecondary schools to display the Ten Commandments in every classroom.

In their complaint filed in federal court in Baton Rouge, the plaintiffs, who are Christian, Jewish, Unitarian Universalist, and non-religious, allege that the newly enacted statute violates longstanding U.S. Supreme Court precedent and the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment. More than 40 years ago, the complaint says, the Supreme Court overturned a similar state law, holding that the separation of church and state bars public schools from posting the Ten Commandments in classrooms.

The complaint further asserts that the law “substantially interferes with and burdens” parents’ First Amendment right to direct their children’s religious education and upbringing, and that, in approving and mandating the display of a specific version of the Ten Commandments, the law runs afoul of the First Amendment’s prohibition against the government taking sides on questions of theological debate.

November 5, 2024 – Environment
Lawsuit Challenges Federal Failure to Examine Risks of Idle Offshore Oil and Gas Infrastructure
The Center for Biological Diversity has sued the U.S. Interior Department, alleging an ongoing failure on the part of the department to examine the harms from offshore oil and gas drilling infrastructure that the oil industry has not decommissioned.

In the Gulf of Mexico, more than 2,700 wells and nearly 500 platforms were overdue for decommissioning — which requires plugging wells and removing platforms or other equipment — as of June 2023, according to the complaint filed in federal court in the District of Columbia. These inactive wells and platforms, the complaint says, “pose serious environmental and safety risks, including oil spills, methane leaks and explosions.”

The center’s lawsuit argues that Interior has violated the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to consider new information and changed circumstances showing that delayed decommissioning puts people and the environment at risk. The suit seeks to force the agency to conduct a new analysis that will better protect people, wildlife, and the Gulf environment.

November 4, 2024 – Securities
Nike Investors Allege Misrepresentations Regarding Consumer Marketing Strategy
Nike investors argue in a proposed class action filed in federal court in Portland, Ore., that the company misrepresented the success of its new direct-to-consumer strategy, which actually caused a major decline in market value and significant losses for stockholders.

In 2017, according to the complaint, Nike began implementing its “Consumer Direct Offense” strategy, which focused on increasing innovation and direct connections with consumers. Consumer Direct Offense, the complaint says, also emphasized Nike’s digital presence as a means of directly connecting with consumers, offering “greater digital expertise and control in the markets where consumer connections happen.”

The lawsuit alleges that (1) Nike’s direct-to-consumer strategy was unable to generate sustainable revenue growth; (2) the company’s purported competitive advantages were unable to protect it from intense competitive pressures after it largely disengaged from many of its wholesale and retail partners to focus on the direct-to-consumer strategy; and (3) as a result, Nike’s representations about its business operations and prospects were “materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.”

November 1, 2024 – Product Liability
Lawsuit Claims Hershey’s Bubble Yum Gum Contains Toxic PFAS Chemicals
In a proposed class action against Hersey Company, plaintiff alleges that defendant’s Bubble Yum bubble gum contains levels of PFAS that exceed safe limits established by California law, potentially exposing him and countless others to serious health risks.

PFAS are toxic chemicals that are widely used in consumer packaging materials, fabrics, Teflon, and a number of other products, according to the complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court. Since they are known to take a long time to degrade inside human bodies and the environment, the complaint says, PFAS are commonly referred to as “forever chemicals” and have been linked to a risk of several serious health complications, including kidney cancer, thyroid disease, testicular cancer, and ulcerative colitis.

Plaintiff says in his lawsuit that pieces of the gum itself and the wrappers used in the packaging material contain potentially dangerous levels of PFAS chemicals. Hershey was aware that the gum exceeded PFAS safety standards but failed to disclose this fact to consumers, plaintiff says, adding that this was especially concerning since Hershey markets Bubble Yum to children, who may face a greater risk from PFAS chemicals due to the potential for hormone disruption, developmental issues, and immune system impairment

October 31, 2024 – Intellectual Property
Wall Street Journal Sues Perplexity AI for Copyright Infringement
News Corp, the parent company of The Wall Street Journal and the New York Post, is suing the artificial intelligence search engine Perplexity AI for infringing copyrighted content.

In a lawsuit filed in Manhattan federal court, News Corp alleges Perplexity copies news articles, analyses, and opinions “on a massive scale.” According to the complaint, Perplexity is an AI startup that trains its AI search models using content from around the web, allowing it to respond to user queries with a summary of its sources. The company, the complaint says, bills itself as a platform that lets users “skip the links” to online articles, which News Corp says drives “customers and critical revenues away from those copyright holders.”

“Seeking to capitalize on this vast market for content,” News Corp. argues, “defendant Perplexity has raised significant capital to build a so-called ‘answer engine.’ This engine, plaintiff contends, “copies on a massive scale, among other things, copyrighted news content, analysis, and opinion as inputs into its internal database. It then uses that copyrighted content to generate responses to users’ queries that are intended to and do act as a substitute for news and other information websites.”

October 30, 2024 – Securities
AI Start-up Made False Statements re ‘Home Companion’ Robot, SEC Charges
The U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission says Destiny Robotics Corp., an artificial intelligence and robotics start-up, and Megi Kavtaradze, its founder and CEO, made false and misleading statements regarding the company’s operations and products, including a robot that would be manufactured and sold as a home companion.

The SEC’s complaint, filed in Miami federal court, alleges that from February 2022 through March 2023, the defendants obtained approximately $141,000 from investors by claiming to be developing the world’s first humanoid AI robot at-home assistant and companion for delivery by 2023.  

In truth, the complaint says, defendants were developing a robot that would have been much less sophisticated and capable than what was described to investors and had no realistic possibility of delivering the robot described to consumers by 2023.  The SEC also claims that defendants falsely described Kavtaradze’s qualifications and failed to disclose his personal relationship with the lead investor.

October 29, 2024 – Consumer Fraud
L’il Critters Gummies Lawsuit Challenges Claim of ‘No Artificial Flavors’
A proposed class action filed in Los Angeles federal court alleges Church & Dwight Co. falsely advertises L’il Critters gummy supplements as free from artificial flavors when, in fact, the products contain DL malic acid, a synthetic flavoring ingredient.

The prominent “No Artificial Flavors” claim on the side of the supplements’ labels is meant to create the impression that the products are naturally flavored, according to the complaint. Consumers perceive naturally flavored products to be healthier than items whose taste comes from or is enhanced by synthetic additives, the complaint says.

Plaintiff alleges in her lawsuit that despite the “No Artificial Flavors” representation, the L’il Critters supplements are artificially flavored using DL malic acid, a highly processed substance commonly used to impart a sour, fruity flavor in food and beverage products. The additive is definitively artificial, plaintiff says, as it is not derived from any natural source or considered a “natural flavor” according to regulations set by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

October 28, 2024 – Privacy
DNA Testing Company Accused of Sharing Personal Data Without Consent
DNA testing company Nebula Genomics faces a proposed federal class action for allegedly violating an Illinois state law that restricts the collection and disclosure of personal genetic information.

Other defendants in the lawsuit filed in Chicago federal court include Meta, Microsoft, and Google. The suit claims that Nebula’s collection and sharing of genetic information with the technology companies violates the state’s Genetic Information Privacy Act, which makes it unlawful for a company to disclose genetic information without written approval.

According to the complaint, defendants Meta, Microsoft, and Google unjustly benefited from the disclosures by gaining the chance to offer its advertising customers enhanced profiles of web users. Nebula, the complaint says, “neither requested nor obtained written consent” from the plaintiff prior to sharing genetic information with the tech companies.

October 25, 2024 – Labor & Employment
Aerospace Company Raytheon Sued Over Alleged Age Discrimination
A proposed class action filed in Boston federal court claims RTX Corporation, formerly known as Raytheon Technologies Corporation, has routinely discriminated against job applicants age 40 and over in favor of younger workers.

The 67-year-old plaintiff alleges in his lawsuit that Raytheon has refused to consider his numerous applications for lower-level positions because of his age. Raytheon’s application and hiring process, plaintiff says, disproportionately harms older workers and violates the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act and several state laws,

Plaintiff argues that Raytheon regularly posts job openings that show a “clear preference for younger workers” while deterring older individuals from applying. The postings, plaintiff says, often use phrases such as “recent college graduate,” “new graduate,” “recent graduate,” and other discriminatory language in a position’s title or job description.

October 24, 2024 – Product Liability
Popular Baby Bottle Brand Accused of Leaching Microplastics
A maker of plastic baby bottles has been hit with a proposed class action filed in San Francisco federal court, claiming the company failed to warn parents that the bottles leached dangerous microplastics when heated.

The lawsuit alleges that Philips North America failed to warn parents that the polypropylene bottles and cups under the brand Philips Avent could, when heated, expose infants to tiny flecks of plastic that can interfere with their digestive, reproductive, and immune systems.

Philips North America, according to the complaint, advertises that its products are “BPA free,” or free of Bisphenol A, a chemical known to leach from some plastics when they are heated. By assuring customers that the products are BPA free, the complaint says, the defendant is creating a false sense of security and misleading consumers about the dangers of their products, which leach microplastics into the liquids the cups and bottles contain.

October 23, 2024 – Cybersecurity
Panorama Eyecare Accused of Negligent Cybersecurity Resulting in Data Breach
A proposed class action claims lax cybersecurity on the part of Panorama Eyecare resulted in a data breach that compromised the personal information of around 378,000 current and former patients.

The lawsuit, filed in Denver federal court, alleges that Panorama, a physician-led management services organization serving eye clinic clients throughout Colorado and Wyoming, failed to protect patients’ data from hackers, who gained access to the defendant’s internal computer network between May 22 and June 4, 2023.

The sensitive personal information exposed in the incident, according to the complaint, may have included full names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, contact details, driver’s license or state ID numbers, financial account information, medical treatments and diagnoses, and health insurance information. The cyberattack, the complaint says,  stemmed directly from defendant’s failure to implement reasonable data security measures to protect the personal information in its care — and defendant waited until nearly a year after the cyberattack occurred to begin sending data breach notices to victims.

October 22, 2024 – Intellectual Property
Beastie Boys Sue Chili’s Restaurant Chain Over ‘Sabotage’ Ads
The Beastie Boys have sued Chili’s restaurant owner Brinker International in Manhattan federal court, alleging Brinker used the rap trio’s 1994 song “Sabotage” to promote the Chili’s chain without the group’s permission.

The group argues in its lawsuit that Brinker unlawfully used “Sabotage” in Chili’s social-media ads, falsely implying that the Beastie Boys endorsed the restaurant chain. The suit alleges copyright and trademark infringement.

According to the complaint, the Beastie Boys formed in New York City in 1981 and dissolved in 2012 after founding member Adam “MCA” Yauch died of cancer. They were inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame earlier that year. “Sabotage,” the complaint says, was a single from the group’s 1994 album “Ill Communication” and gained fame for its music video, a parody of 1970s television police dramas.  

October 21, 2024 – Disability Act
Justice Department Sues LA Fitness for ‘Systematic Discrimination’ Against Those With Disabilities
The U.S. Justice Department has filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles federal court against LA Fitness, operated by Fitness International LLC, for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The department alleges in its suit that LA Fitness has systematically discriminated against individuals with disabilities by offering dysfunctional facilities, such as inoperable pool lifts and inaccessible showers, across its more than 700 locations in the U.S.

The complaint describes multiple instances where disabled patrons encountered barriers at LA Fitness facilities. For example, patrons with multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, and other disabilities were either unable to use the gym’s amenities or forced to rely on assistance due to broken equipment. In some cases, the complaint says, patrons even had to crawl out of pools, causing physical discomfort and emotional distress.

October 17, 2024 – Securities
SEC Charges Founder of AI Hiring Startup Joonko with Fraud
The U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission has charged Ilit Raz, CEO and founder of artificial intelligence (AI) recruitment startup Joonko, with defrauding investors out of at least $21 million by making false and misleading statements about the quantity and quality of Joonko’s customers, the number of candidates on its platform, and the company’s revenue.

According to the SEC complaint filed in Manhattan federal court, Joonko claimed to use AI to help clients find diverse and underrepresented candidates to fulfill their DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) hiring goals. To raise money for Joonko, the complaint says, Raz falsely told investors that Joonko had more than 100 customers, including Fortune 500 companies, and provided investors with fabricated testimonials from several companies expressing their appreciation for Joonko and praising its effectiveness.

In its complaint, the SEC also alleges that Raz lied to investors that Joonko had earned more than $1 million in revenue and was working with more than 100,000 active job candidates. When an investor grew suspicious of Raz’s claims, Raz allegedly provided the investor with falsified bank statements and forged contracts in an effort to conceal the fraud. The scheme unraveled in mid-2023, the complaint says, when the investor confronted Raz, who admitted to forging bank statements and contracts and lying about Joonko’s revenue and number of customers.

October 16, 2024 – Intellectual Property
Little Caesars Faces Trademark Lawsuit Over ‘Pizza Puffs’
Little Caesars’ introduction of its new “Crazy Puffs” menu item — which the company describes as Pizza Puffs — infringes on plaintiff’s nearly 50-year-old “Pizza Puffs” trademark, alleges a lawsuit filed in Chicago federal court.

In March 2024, according to the complaint, Little Caesars Enterprises Inc. introduced the “Crazy Puff” product, even referencing the product as a “Pizza Puff” on its website. Plaintiff Illinois Tamale Co., which says it has owned Pizza Puffs marks since 1976, claims that Little Caesars is illegally using the term in its product description.

Upon learning about defendant’s introduction of its Crazy Puffs product into the market and its use of the term “Pizza Puffs,” plaintiff says it immediately sent defendant a cease-and-desist letter, demanding that it stop using the marks or any version of “puffs” in connection with the sale of its products. After weeks of discussion between the parties, plaintiff says, “it became clear that defendant was simply dragging negotiations on with no intention of stopping use of the Infringing Marks.”

October 15, 2024 – Consumer Fraud
Costco Fails to Disclose When Products Sold Online Are More Costly Than Same Items Sold In-Store, Lawsuit Claims
A proposed class action filed in Seattle federal court alleges that Costco has posted deceptive marked-up prices on its website, failing to disclose that consumers may pay more for a product sold on Costco.com than if they bought the same item in-store.

Although Costco promises to disclose whenever a product is more expensive online than in a consumer’s local warehouse store, the company often leaves out this disclosure on its online product pages, according to the complaint. Costco deceives shoppers into making online purchases “that they otherwise would not make,” causing them to pay higher prices, the complaint says.

“By failing to disclose the truth to consumers about its online markup practices and the substantial price differential between identical items sold online and in-store, Costco deceives consumers and gains an unfair upper hand on competitors that fairly disclose their true pricing practices,” the complaint argues.

October 14, 2024 – Antitrust
Class Action Accuses Amazon of Audiobook Monopoly
Amazon.com faces a proposed class action filed in Seattle federal court claiming that, through its Audible unit, it has monopolized the retail market for audiobooks, leading authors to overpay for the distribution of their works.

Plaintiff in her lawsuit alleges Amazon is violating U.S. antitrust law by charging higher distribution fees for writers who do not exclusively use the company’s e-commerce platform. Amazon has used exclusivity agreements “to lock up content,” impairing the ability of rivals to compete and affecting billions of dollars in audiobook sales, plaintiff says.

According to the complaint, Audible is the world’s largest audiobook retailer, accounting for more than 60% of domestic purchasing compared with about 20% for Apple. The suit seeks more than $5 million in damages and class action status for thousands of authors who paid a distribution fee to Amazon of at least 60% on sales. That fee increases to 75% for “non-exclusive” audiobooks that are sold on Amazon and elsewhere, the complaint says.

October 11, 2024 – Product Liability
Lawsuit Alleges Infotainment System Defect in 2021-2024 Chrysler, Ram, Jeep, Dodge Vehicles
A proposed class action against FCA US alleges a defect in the automaker’s Uconnect infotainment system in certain model-year Chrysler, Ram, Jeep, and Dodge vehicles that can potentially cause driver problems.

According to the complaint filed in Detroit federal court, the widespread Uconnect system defect is the subject of numerous accusations from drivers who say they’ve experienced the malfunction of various safety, navigation, communication, and entertainment features while driving certain vehicle models, including 2021-2024 Chrysler Pacifica, 2022-2024 Ram 1500, 2500 and 3500, 2022-2024 Ram Chassis Cab, and others.

In particular, the complaint says, drivers have complained of the Uconnect system screens intermittently and inexplicably freezing, going black, glitching, rebooting, or otherwise becoming inoperable. These Uconnect failures can lead to issues with a vehicle’s GPS navigation system, radio and audio systems, Bluetooth connectivity, rearview backup camera, display screen, touchscreen buttons, hands-free cell phone functionality, and more.

October 10, 2024 – Constitution
Virginia NAACP Sues School Board for Restoring Confederate Names
The Virginia NAACP has sued a county school board over its reinstatement of Confederate military names to two schools, accusing the board of subjecting Black students to a racially discriminatory educational environment.

The school board in Shenandoah County voted 5-1 in May 2024 to revert the name of Mountain View High School back to Stonewall Jackson High School, and that of Honey Run Elementary to Ashby Lee Elementary, according to the complaint filed in federal court in Harrisonburg, Va. The school names refer to military leaders of the Confederacy.

The plaintiffs argue in their suit that the decision to restore the names endorses racial discrimination, violates students’ rights to an equal education, and subjects them to psychological harm. The plaintiffs also contend that the U.S. Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause prohibits racial discrimination in state-supported institutions. For example, the suit says, an incoming freshman who is Black would be forced to play sports as a member of the Stonewall Jackson “Generals” and would have to wear a uniform “adorned with a name and logo that symbolizes hatred, White supremacy, and Massive Resistance to integration.”

October 9, 2024 – Labor & Employment
Older Worker Says Defense Contractor Discriminates by Seeking Recent College Grads
A major defense contractor, RTX Corporation, has been sued in a proposed class action over allegations that it discriminates against older workers in job ads.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Boston, accuses RTX, formally known as Raytheon Technologies Corp., of posting ads that target younger workers at the expense of their older peers in violation of the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). “Raytheon routinely publishes job postings for numerous jobs where the only basic qualification is being a recent college graduate and where Raytheon unlawfully indicates a preference for younger workers and deters older workers from applying,” the suit claims.

The plaintiff in the case, 67 years old, says he applied for several positions at the company since 2019. When denied employment, plaintiff says he filed a complaint with the EEOC alleging he wasn’t considered for these jobs, and the EEOC found he was denied due to his age. The EEOC also found Raytheon’s job advertisements violated the ADEA, according to the complaint.

October 8, 2024 – Antitrust
Equifax Accused of Antitrust Violations Over Work Verification Services
Data analytics giant Equifax has been accused by two home mortgage lenders of monopolizing the market for electronic income and employment verification services, resulting in higher prices.

In a proposed class action, plaintiffs Greystone Mortgage and First Financial Lending allege that Equifax had a “stranglehold” over a verification process that is a critical part of consumer finance. According to the complaint filed in Philadelphia federal court, lenders, property managers, and others rely on their quick ability to electronically verify an applicant’s income and employment for mortgages, car loans, and rental apartment agreements. Manually calling employers can be slow, the complaint says.

Plaintiffs say in their lawsuit that Equifax, which is best known for providing credit history reports, has violated antitrust law through exclusive contracts and buying up would-be competitors. This industry domination, plaintiffs argue, has allowed Equifax to charge for its services “far higher than a competitive market would bear.” The case was brought on behalf of at least tens of thousands of purchasers of Equifax’s income and employment services.

October 7, 2024 – Consumer Fraud
Jack Daniel’s Country Cocktails Contain No Whiskey, Lawsuit Alleges
A proposed class action filed in Manhattan federal court alleges that Jack Daniel’s Country Cocktail beverages are falsely advertised as they do not contain whiskey.

According to the complaint, defendant Brown-Forman Corp. has labeled the drinks in a way that leads consumers to expect the Country Cocktail that’s “Best Served Ice Cold” to contain the fundamental ingredients of a Lynchburg lemonade. However, the complaint says, the beverage contains only a negligible amount of whiskey, if any, and is actually a “malt beverage” rather than a drink made with distilled spirits.

Plaintiffs in their lawsuit contend that the labeling is misleading because the absence of whiskey is only disclosed in small-print statements found on the side and bottom of the can or bottle, which identify the drink as a “Flavored Beer” and a “Premium Malt Beverage With Natural Flavors and Certified Colors Added.” Further, plaintiffs argue, defendant’s use of the Jack Daniel’s brand name — along with its trademark colors, fonts and stylistic elements — also creates a false impression that the product contains whiskey.

October 3, 2024 – Cybersecurity
Nissan Data Breach Lawsuit Alleges Info of at Least 53K Employees Exposed in Cyberattack
Nissan North America has been hit with a proposed class action over a data breach in which it is alleged that the personal information of at least 53,000 current and former employees of the automaker was accessed by cybercriminals.

The Nissan data breach included Social Security numbers, dates of birth, and employee ID numbers, a virtual “gold mine for data thieves” claims the lawsuit filed in federal court in Nashville, Tenn. Nissan, the suit says, failed to notify data breach victims until nearly six months after it discovered the incident.

In their suit, plaintiffs say they and class members are at substantial risk of experiencing identity theft and various other forms of personal, social, and financial harm, and this risk “will remain for their respective lifetimes.” Nissan reportedly discovered a “data security incident” in November 2023, during which an unauthorized party gained access to the automaker’s network and files housed within its computer systems. The company, plaintiffs say, has given no assurance that the data accessed during the cyberattack has been recovered or destroyed or that it has properly bolstered its cybersecurity to avoid a similar data breach in the future.

October 2, 2024 – Environment
New York Sues JBS, the Brazilian Beef Giant, Over Its Climate Claims
New York State has sued JBS USA, the American arm of the world’s largest meatpacker, accusing the company of making misleading statements about its efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The lawsuit, filed in N.Y. state court, alleges that JBS has made a series of deceptive statements about its record on climate change, including claims that it will achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2040. As the global leader in beef production, the suit says, the JBS Group knows that if consumers perceive its products as unsustainable, it could reduce consumer demand for beef and harm the company’s share of the U.S. beef market.

Across its marketing materials, the state argues, the JBS Group has made sweeping representations to consumers about its commitment to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions, claiming that it will be “Net Zero by 2040, but defendant has had no viable plan to meet its commitment to be net zero by that date.

October 1, 2024 – Product Liability
Industry Groups Sue to Block ‘Forever Chemicals’ Drinking Water Rule
U.S. manufacturing and chemical industry groups have filed a lawsuit seeking to block a new federal rule setting the first-ever drinking water standard to protect people against toxic “forever chemicals.”

The rule is intended to reduce exposure to the group of 15,000 PFAS (forever chemicals) for approximately 100 million people, according to the complaint. PFAS, the complaint says, are called “forever chemicals” because they do not easily break down in the human body or environment and are found in hundreds of consumer and commercial products, including non-stick pans, cosmetics, firefighting foams, and stain-resistant clothing.

In a petition filed against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, the National Association of Manufacturers and the American Chemistry Council say the rule is “arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion.” The rule, the groups say, exceeds the EPA’s authority under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, a 1974 law empowering the agency to pass water-quality regulations.

September 30, 2024 – Securities
Fastly Faces Investor Suit After Lowered Revenue Estimates
Software provider Fastly Inc. has been sued in a proposed class action filed by a shareholder in federal court in Oakland, Calif., alleging the company misled investors by overstating its financial position.

Fastly operates an edge cloud platform for processing customers’ applications, according to the complaint. Fastly’s platform, the complaint says, includes a Content Delivery Network (CDN) that allows content owners, such as media companies and e-commerce vendors, to pay CDN operators to deliver their content to their end users.

Plaintiff in his lawsuit claims defendant made false and/or misleading statements by failing to disclose that: (i) contrary to its representations to investors, Fastly was, in fact, experiencing a significant deceleration in growth among its largest customers and was losing the increased market share it had gained as a result of a recent CDN consolidation trend, and (ii) these issues were likely to have a “material negative impact”  
on the company’s revenue growth.

September 26, 2024 – Intellectual Property
Dyson Says SharkNinja Copies Cyclonic Vacuum Technology
SharkNinja Inc. copied groundbreaking cyclonic vacuum cleaner technology developed by rival appliance maker Dyson Inc. and should be permanently blocked from selling its patent-infringing bagless vacuums, according to a lawsuit filed by Dyson in federal court in Marshall, Texas.

Dyson states in its suit that it manufactures and sells patented household vacuum cleaners that use cyclonic separation technology to spin dust and dirt out of the air at incredibly high speeds. This leaves the airflow unobstructed and allows the vacuums to maintain a constant level of suction. As a result of 30+ years of innovation, Dyson says, it has a leading portfolio of patented floorcare solutions covering all aspects of its industry-leading vacuums.

Nearly a dozen low-cost models of SharkNinja’s cyclonic floor cleaners, Dyson alleges, have “striking similarities” with Dyson bagless vacuums, which let defendant steal Dyson’s market share. “The resemblance between SharkNinja’s products and Dyson’s patented products is undeniable. Nor is it accidental,” Dyson says.

September 25, 2024 – Constitution
Librarians Challenge Ban on Books Dealing With Gender and Sexuality
An Alabama public library’s policy that prevents anyone under the age of 17 from accessing current titles about gender and sexuality violates the children’s First Amendment rights, plaintiffs argue in a lawsuit filed in federal court in Montgomery, Ala.

According to the complaint, the library is no longer permitted to acquire any material (other than biology, anatomy, or religious texts) advertised for children aged 17 or younger that contains content including sexual conduct, sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender discordance.

Plaintiffs, including Read Free Alabama and the Alabama Library Assoc., say in their suit that these restrictions violate the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution in that they are overbroad and discriminate on the basis of content. Plaintiffs are asking the court to declare the policies unconstitutional and void and to enjoin the library from implementing or enforcing them.

September 24, 2024 – Labor & Employment
Texas Sues to Block EEOC Guidance Protecting Gender Identity
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is suing the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, opposing a 2024-released EEOC guidance on workplace harassment that shields LGBTQ+ employees who seek to use pronouns and bathrooms consistent with their gender identity, in a lawsuit filed in federal court in Amarillo, Texas.

In his suit, Paxton alleges that the EEOC is in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. He pointed to the similarity of the recently released document to a 2021 EEOC guidance on workplace bathrooms, dress codes, and locker rooms for LGBTQ+ workers, in which the district court vacated the guidance and issued a declaratory judgment that it was unlawful on several grounds — including on the basis that it was contrary to law because Title VII does not require employers to provide accommodations based on gender identity regarding bathrooms, dress codes, or pronoun usage.

The 2024 guidance, according to the complaint, declares that Title VII requires employees to use others’ preferred pronouns; allow transgender individuals to use the shower, locker room, or restroom that corresponds to their gender identity; and allow employees to adhere to the dress code that applies to the opposite biological sex. But this guidance, the complaint says, violates this court’s declaratory judgment on the 2021 guidance and the court should, therefore, issue: (1) further declaratory relief clarifying the scope of its judgment; (2) permanent injunctive relief against interpreting Title VII as including dress code, bathroom, or pronoun accommodations in the workplace based on gender identity; and (3) vacate and set aside the 2024 guidance on the basis that it violates the court’s previous judgment.

September 23, 2024 – Privacy
Target Accused of Secretly Embedding Spyware in Marketing Emails
Target Corp. has surreptitiously embedded tracking technology into its marketing emails to collect recipients’ personal data without their knowledge, alleges a proposed class action filed in federal court in the District of Arizona.

The lawsuit accuses the retailer of integrating tracking tools known as “spy pixels” into its promotional emails to secretly capture information about consumers as soon as they open the email. The suit alleges that Target has violated an Arizona privacy law by collecting residents’ email data without first obtaining their authorization.

According to the complaint, Target intercepts consumer data through its own spy pixels, as well as through trackers provided by Scene 7, a subsidiary of Adobe, that are hidden within email images. When a consumer opens a promotional email from Target, the complaint says, the tracking tools automatically record information about the device the recipient used, their IP address, when and where they opened the message, how long they spent reading it, to whom it may have been forwarded, and other sensitive data.

September 19, 2024 – Consumer Fraud
Toyota Vehicle Paint Coating Not as Rugged as Advertised, Lawsuit Says
A proposed class action filed in Los Angeles federal court alleges Toyota Motor North America has falsely advertised that certain of its vehicle models will be “free of clear coat and paint damage” for “many years, no matter the terrain, weather, and climate. 

Plaintiff claims in his lawsuit that although Toyota represents that its vehicles are “rugged, built to last, and will hold up to the elements for years to come,” his Toyota Tacoma was covered with defective paint and clear coat damage. 

The paint and clear coat were “of poor quality and/or not properly or adequately applied,” plaintiff says, that it caused the coat to weaken and/or deteriorate and the paint to “oxidize and turn dull.” Ultimately, according to the complaint, oxidation causes vehicle paint to turn dull, become faded and take on a “chalky/dusty appearance.” And when a vehicle’s clear coat deteriorates, it can permanently dissolve the paint and leave the car’s body more susceptible to rust, the complaint says.

September 18, 2024 – Intellectual Property
Shopify Sues Rival, Alleging Copyright Infringement of E-commerce Platform
E-commerce provider Shopify has sued rival Shopline in Manhattan federal court, accusing it of illegally copying Shopify’s software to build its own e-commerce platform.

In its lawsuit, Shopify alleges defendant created a “thinly disguised knockoff” of Shopify’s Dawn storefront-template technology to power competing e-commerce services. Dawn software, Shopify says “forms the backbone of the way an e-commerce site appears and functions,” adding that Shopline’s Seed software copies Shopify’s Dawn software “wholesale.”

“From the highest level of overarching organization to the smallest level of individual lines of code, the evidence of Shopline’s copying is overwhelming,” Shopify says, also claiming that the illegal copying includes “large swaths” of matching filenames and other elements.

September 17, 2024 – Product Liability
Lawsuit Claims Toyota Corolla Models Plagued by Coolant Bypass Valve Defect
A proposed class action filed in San Francisco federal court alleges 2019-2023 model year Toyota RAV4s and Toyota Corollas are equipped with defective coolant bypass valves prone to premature failure, potentially causing engine overheating and even catastrophic failure.

The alleged defect, according to the complaint, can cause coolant to leak out of a vehicle’s closed-loop coolant system, harming its ability to properly regulate engine temperature. This can cause overheating, stalling, increased emissions, and total engine failure, the complaint says, adding that it also allows coolant to leak into and damage surrounding engine components, including a vehicle’s electrical system.

In their lawsuit, plaintiffs also argue that a coolant leak can corrode the sensor on the RAV4 or Corolla coolant bypass valve, which can cause it to remain in the open or closed position and be unable to properly direct coolant throughout the engine. The suit accuses Toyota of actively concealing its knowledge of the defect from RAV4 and Corolla buyers and lessees and refusing to correct the problem without cost when it manifests outside of a vehicle’s warranty period.  

September 16, 2024 – Antitrust
Pratt & Whitney Faces Used Aircraft Engine and Parts Lawsuit
Aerospace company Pratt & Whitney Canada has been hit with a $150 million lawsuit filed in Philadelphia federal court alleging Pratt is trying to stifle competition from companies selling used engines and parts for regional commercial aircraft, freight operations, and other applications

Pratt blocks rivals from obtaining its used PT6 and PW100 turboprop engines to sell to aircraft operators and other purchasers, according to plaintiff Universal Turbine Parts (UTP), a supplier of aftermarket aircraft engines and engine parts that competes with Pratt, the world’s largest turboprop aircraft engine maker. UTP in its suit accuses Pratt of violating antitrust laws by barring the company’s approved “overhaul facilities” from supplying UTP and others with engines and parts.

“Pratt’s multi-faceted scheme encompasses a veritable smorgasbord of antitrust offenses,” UTP contends, arguing that Pratt’s alleged anti-competitive actions mean “decreased choice for aircraft operators and other purchasers of aircraft engines, and higher prices as Pratt becomes the only remaining option.”

September 12, 2024 – Product Liability
Mercedes-Benz Accused of ‘Actively Concealing’ Defective AMG Rims and Tires on S580 Vehicles
A proposed class action alleges 2021-2024 Mercedes-Benz S580 vehicles are equipped with defective 21-inch AMG V-multispoke wheels prone to cause tire blowouts.

The lawsuit, filed in Atlanta federal court, accuses Mercedes-Benz of failing to disclose that the S580 sedans at issue are equipped with 21-inch wheels and tires that are unable to withstand the weight of the vehicle itself, which compromises the rims’ and tires’ structural integrity and inevitably causes blowouts, sidewall bubbling, deflation, cracked rims, and other problems for drivers.

The plaintiff alleges in his suit that Mercedes-Benz knew of the wheel configuration defect through pre-production testing and a noticeable uptick in customer service calls, warranty claims, and customer complaints to dealers. Despite its knowledge of the wheel and rim defect, the defendant “actively concealed” the safety issue from drivers, many of whom were told by the automaker that their wheel/tire problems were not due to a defect but instead that the blowouts were caused by potholes or “other driver error,” plaintiff says.

September 11, 2024 – Constitution
Lawsuit Challenges Tennessee Laws Targeting Crossover Voting in Primary Elections
A group of Tennesseans who say they were intimidated into not voting in a primary election or threatened with prosecution after they did vote has filed a legal challenge in Nashville federal court to state laws meant to prevent crossover voting.

A law passed last year, according to the complaint, requires polling places to post warning signs stating that it’s a crime for someone to vote in a political party’s primary if they are not a member of that party. Another law requires primary voters to be “bona fide” party members or to “declare allegiance” to the party they are voting for. Neither law, the complaint says, defines what it means to be a bona fide party member or defines how a voter should declare allegiance to a party.

In their lawsuit, plaintiffs claim the Tennessee voting laws violate their First Amendment rights to participate in the political process. They also contend the laws violate the due process clause of the U.S. Constitution because they are so vague that voters cannot know whether they will be prosecuted. In fact, plaintiffs argue, prosecutors in different judicial districts have offered very different interpretations of the laws and how they should be enforced.

September 10, 2024 – Privacy
Delta Air Lines Unlawfully Shares Website Visitors’ Data with Facebook, Lawsuit Alleges
A proposed class action accuses Delta Air Lines of secretly sharing website visitors’ private data with Facebook without visitors’ knowledge or consent.

The airline has intentionally embedded invisible web-tracking tools into website Delta.com that automatically capture and transmit users’ personal information to Facebook, which then uses the data for marketing purposes, according to the complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court.

Plaintiffs claim in their lawsuit that Delta utilizes pieces of back-end code provided by Facebook — namely, the Meta pixel and Conversions application programming interface — to secretly track and record a consumer’s every interaction on Delta.com. “This is the functional equivalent of placing a bug or listening device on a phone line because [Delta’s] website allows third parties to ‘listen in’ and receive communications in real time that [the plaintiffs] intended only for [Delta],” plaintiffs argue.

September 9, 2024 – Truth in Lending
Wells Fargo Accused of Illegally Seizing Deposit Accounts When Credit Loans Are Not Paid
A proposed class action filed in San Francisco federal court alleges that Wells Fargo illegally seizes funds from customers’ deposit accounts should they fail to pay an open-end credit loan in a timely manner.

The lawsuit claims that the bank unlawfully seizes the funds of consumers who have both a deposit account and open-end credit with the bank without regard to federal and state rules that govern bank liens and bank levies, and without court approval or notice to the customer. 

According to the complaint, Wells Fargo’s conduct will sometimes leave a customer with no money left in their account to meet their basic needs and is outlawed under the federal Truth In Lending Act, among other laws. Specifically, the complaint says, the act decrees that, with limited exceptions, a card issuer may not take any action against a cardholder’s deposit accounts to offset indebtedness from a consumer credit transaction.

September 5, 2024 – Consumer Fraud
Prime Energy Sports Drink Lawsuit Filed Over Caffeine Levels, PFAS Exposure
Prime Hydration LLC, the maker of Prime Energy drinks, faces a proposed class action alleging that their products contain an excessive amount of caffeine and potentially toxic “forever chemicals.”

According to the complaint filed in Manhattan federal court, Prime Energy drinks contain high levels of caffeine and high amounts of PFAS, more commonly known as “forever chemicals” that can cause serious illness. The drinks, the complaint, says, are not tightly regulated in the U.S. because they are considered dietary supplements, and many manufacturers do not even disclose the ingredients or levels of caffeine contained in each bottle.

Plaintiff says in her lawsuit that high levels of caffeine have been linked to irregular heartbeats, resulting in increased blood pressure, heart arrhythmias, fainting, seizures, and sudden death, particularly in younger consumers. While Prime Energy’s label indicates that it contains 200 milligrams of caffeine, the equivalent of six cans of Coca-Cola or two cans of Red Bull, plaintiff claims the actual amount of caffeine can vary, up to 225 milligrams of caffeine.

September 4, 2024 – Antitrust
Boehringer Ingelheim Accused of Holding Monopoly on Asthma, COPD Inhaler Drugs
A proposed class action alleges Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals holds an illegal monopoly on two drugs used in inhalation sprays to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, even though its patents on the underlying active ingredients expired roughly four years ago.

The brand-name drugs Combivent Respimat, for COPD, and Spiriva Respimat, for COPD and asthma, are the only inhaler sprays for their active ingredients available in the United States, according to the complaint filed in Connecticut federal court. The drugs were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2011 and 2014, respectively, the complaint says, and today both sprays are widely used to help asthma and COPD patients manage their diseases.

Plaintiffs say in their lawsuit that in exchange for developing the drugs, Boehringer received patents that allowed the company to earn more than $45 billion in profits. However, plaintiffs claim, Boehringer’s patents on the inhaler ingredients at issue, which gave the company a monopoly on the drugs, expired in 2020. Both drugs should now be available to millions of COPD and asthma patients nationwide in a lower-cost, generic variety, plaintiffs argue, “yet Boehringer, to this day, is the only company that produces and sells Combivent Respimat and Spiriva Respimat.”

September 3, 2024 – Intellectual Property
Google Named in Lawsuit by US Artists Over AI Image Generator
Google has been sued in San Francisco federal court by a group of visual artists who claim the company used their work without permission to train Imagen, its artificial-intelligence-powered image generator.

Photographer Jingna Zhang and cartoonists Sarah Andersen, Hope Larson, and Jessica Fink allege in their proposed class action that Google is liable for misusing “billions” of copyrighted images, including theirs, to teach Imagen how to respond to human text prompts.

Plaintiffs note in their lawsuit that this is one of many such suits brought by copyright owners against tech companies, including Microsoft, OpenAI, and Meta, over the data used to train their generative AI systems. Plaintiffs Zhang and Andersen, the complaint says, are also involved in similar ongoing suits against Stability AI, Midjourney, and others over the companies’ alleged misuse of plaintiffs’ work to train AI image generators.

September 2, 2024 – Antitrust
Gerber, Perrigo Sued Over Cost of ‘Store-Brand’ Infant Formula
Infant formula makers Gerber and Perrigo face a proposed class action filed in federal court in Alexandria, Va., accusing the companies of scheming to artificially drive up prices for “store-brand” formula sold at Walmart, Walgreens, and other retailers.

Perrigo violated antitrust law, according to the complaint, by illegally agreeing with Gerber to block competitors from cutting into the market for store-brand formula.

The complaint describes Perrigo as the country’s top supplier of store-brand formula, which is sold under various retailer labels. Gerber, the plaintiffs claim in their lawsuit, agreed to give Perrigo “first right of refusal” to Gerber’s excess formula supply, which a competitor otherwise might have used to sell to retailers at a lower price.

August 29, 2024 – Product Liability
Heavy Metals in Baby Food Led to Autism Diagnosis, Lawsuit Alleges
Baby food manufacturers, including Gerber, Nestle, Plum Organics, Campbell, and Sprout Foods, are accused in Manhattan federal court of “malicious recklessness” for selling toxic baby food loaded with heavy metals that increase the risk of autism among children.

In her lawsuit, the plaintiff says that her daughter was diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder at two years old after being fed baby food products manufactured by each of the defendants, noting that these products were all contaminated with high levels of lead, arsenic, and mercury that exceeded regulatory limits. Exposure to those toxic heavy metals led to plaintiff’s daughter suffering brain injuries that manifested as autism, the suit argues.

Plaintiff states that if she and other parents had been warned about the high levels of heavy metals and the possible impacts, they would not have purchased the products. However, she says, defendants decided to place profits over the welfare and safety of infants. “Defendants’ malicious recklessness and callous disregard for human life have wreaked havoc on the health of countless vulnerable children,” plaintiff contends, “all so that Defendants could maximize profits while deliberately misleading parents regarding the safety of their Baby Foods.”

August 28, 2024 – Consumer Fraud
Avis Faces Rental Car Lawsuit Over ‘Fuel Service Charge’
A proposed class action claims Avis forces certain rental car customers to pay for fuel twice by improperly imposing a fuel service charge on those who opt to fill a vehicle’s gas tank before returning it to the company.

Avis improperly levies the fuel service charge at issue on customers who select the company’s “Self-Service” fueling option, which purportedly allows a consumer to avoid paying fuel service charges by requiring the driver to fill the vehicle’s gas tank before returning it to Avis, according to the complaint filed in New Jersey federal court. Avis assesses the fuel service charge on “Self-Service” customers, the complaint says, despite acknowledging a full fuel tank upon the return of a vehicle and the customer’s selection of the self-service fuel option.

In their lawsuit, plaintiffs contend that “As a result, consumers who utilize the Self-Service option are ultimately forced to pay for fuel twice. First, they pay to fill the rental vehicle with fuel before dropping it off, as required by the Self-Service fuel option. Second, they are required to pay the fuel service charge after they return the vehicle.”

August 27, 2024 – Securities
SEC Accused of Unlawfully Tracking Those  Who Invest in Stock Market
The U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission is illegally collecting data of every citizen who invests in the stock market, claims a lawsuit filed in federal court in Waco, Tex.

In its suit, the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) contends that the agency, through its “Consolidated Audit Trail” or “CAT” program, is collecting massive amounts of personally identifiable data by forcing brokers, exchanges, clearing agencies, and alternative trading systems to capture and send detailed information on every investor’s trades in U.S. markets to a centralized database. 

The NCLA calls CAT “the greatest government-mandated mass collection of personal financial data” in United States history. “Historically, a government that wished to track its citizens had to devote large resources to having them followed. That is no longer the case: modern surveillance tools enable mass tracking of individuals’ every movement, every transaction, every purchase, sale, or transfer of securities at low cost while powerful computer algorithms can process that information to reveal personal and private details of each person’s financial life or investment strategy,” the NCLA argues. 

August 26, 2024 – Intellectual Property
Shine TV Alleges Unlawful Sale of Goods Implying Association With ‘Master Chef’
Shine TV has filed a trademark infringement and cybersquatting lawsuit alleging sale of counterfeit goods associated with its show “Master Chef.”

Plaintiff Shine TV is a British media production company founded in March 2001 by Elisabeth Murdoch, daughter of News Corporation CEO Rupert Murdoch. In its complaint filed in Dallas federal court, Shine accuses defendant MasterChef LLC of operating a website that infringes plaintiff’s mark and logo to sell cooking-related products and implies a false association with the popular show. Plaintiff’s MasterChef show, the complaint says, is watched globally by over 300 million viewers and has transformed over one hundred (100) amateur chefs into professionals.

Shine TV says in its suit that defendant uses marks that are identical to or confusingly similar to plaintiff’s Master Chef marks. Further, plaintiff says, defendant has engaged in cybersquatting, with its website, www.masterchef.us, confusingly similar to that of plaintiff, www.masterchef.com.

August 22, 2024 – Labor & Employment
Convenience Store Chain Faces Employment Discrimination Lawsuit
The Sheetz convenience store chain has been hit with a civil action by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission alleging the company discriminated against minority job applicants.

Sheetz Inc., which operates more than 700 stores in six states, discriminated against Black, Native American, and multiracial job seekers by automatically weeding out applicants whom the company deemed to have failed a criminal background check, according to the complaint filed in federal court in Baltimore, Md.

In its lawsuit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the EEOC claims the chain’s longstanding practices have a disproportionate impact on minority applicants and thus violate federal civil rights law. The suit does not argue that Sheetz was motivated by racial animus but takes issue with the way the chain uses criminal background checks to screen job seekers.

August 21, 2024 – Consumer Fraud
J&J Band-Aids Alleged to Contain ‘Forever Chemicals’
Johnson & Johnson and its division Kenvue face a proposed class regarding the marketing and sale of defendants’ Band-Aid products, which allegedly contain PFAS “forever chemicals.”

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Trenton, N.J., says that the packaging claims the products are “designed to wick away fluids and keep your wound clean” and “cushion painful wounds while you heal.”

But in fact, the suit contends, the products are unfit for their intended purpose because they contain PFAS “forever chemicals” that are dangerous to human health. PFAS, the suit says, are a group of synthetic chemicals that, because they persist and accumulate over time, are harmful even at very low levels.

August 20, 2024 – Securities
SentinelOne Sued for Over-Inflating Projected Revenue
SentinelOne Inc., a cybersecurity platform that employs AI in threat detection and response, faces a shareholder derivative lawsuit filed in federal court in the District of Delaware alleging that the company and senior executives concealed a lack of effective accounting controls, resulting in over-inflation of the company’s projected revenue.

SentinelOne, according to the complaint, pioneered the world’s first purpose-built artificial intelligence detection platform “intended to make cybersecurity defense truly autonomous.” The company and its top executives have repeatedly touted the financial success of the company. However, the complaint says, in June 2023 the company announced that its revenue projections were overstated and would be revised to reflect a less optimistic outlook. On this news, the company’s stock price fell more than thirty-five percent.

In his shareholder action, plaintiff argues that defendants breached their fiduciary duties by issuing materially false and misleading statements and causing the omission of certain material facts to the investing public. Specifically, plaintiff says, defendants failed to disclose to investors that SentinelOne lacked effective internal controls over accounting and financial reporting, and as a result of defendants’ positive statements about the company’s business operations, its prospects were materially misleading and lacked a reasonable basis.

August 19, 2024 – Disabilities Act
Under Armour Website Said to Discriminate Against Those With Disabilities
Footwear company Under Armour Inc. has been named in a proposed class action alleging that the company’s website denies full access to blind and visually impaired individuals.

According to the complaint filed in Minneapolis federal court, the defendant’s website — www.underarmour.com — because it lacks screen reader technology is not fully and equally accessible to people who are blind or who have low vision, in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act. Plaintiff in her lawsuit seeks a permanent injunction requiring a change in defendant’s corporate policies to make its online store accessible to individuals with visual disabilities.

In many ways, the complaint says, individuals with disabilities rely on web content more so than their nondisabled peers because of inherent transportation, communication, and other barriers. “A blind person does not have the same autonomy to drive to a covered entity’s office as a sighted person.”  A person with visual disabilities, the complaint says, relies on screen reader technology to navigate the internet. This technology translates the visual internet into an auditory equivalent, plaintiff argues.

August 15, 2024 – Product Liability
Ford Accused of Concealing Fusion, Escape Transmission Problems
A lawsuit filed in Detroit federal court alleges certain 2010-2020 Ford Fusion and 2009-2021 Ford Escape vehicles are equipped with defective transmissions that render the cars unsafe and unfit to drive. 

Ford knew of the problems since at least 2009, prior to selling affected Fusion and Escape models, yet failed to warn buyers and lessees, according to the complaint. Ford has “repeatedly lied” to drivers with regard to the root cause of the Fusion and Escape transmission defect, the complaint says, leaving consumers stuck in “unsafe” vehicles with diminished values that have necessitated pricey repairs. 

Plaintiffs contend in their suit that the Fusion and Escape transmission defect reflects “a fundamental design failure with respect to the software, hardware, and how they work together.” The inherent failure of the transmissions’ command-and-control hardware and software systems to operate harmoniously has produced “a wide array of symptoms” consistent with those complained of by Ford drivers nationwide to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, plaintiffs say.

August 14, 2024 – Environment
Conservation Groups File Lawsuit Seeking to Restore Wolf Protections in Rocky Mountain States
The Center for Biological Diversity and several other conservation groups have filed suit in federal court in Missoula, Mont., against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service over its denial of the groups’ petitions to protect gray wolves in the Rocky Mountains under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).

Plaintiffs, which also include the Humane Society of the United States and the Sierra Club, contend in their lawsuit that the service unreasonably denied two petitions from 2021 to restore federal protections for gray wolves in Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, north-central Utah and the eastern portions of Oregon and Washington state — protections that the service eliminated in 2011 and 2012.

Despite significant scientific evidence demonstrating the imperiled status of wolves in the region and the service’s own predictions of significant population declines over the next ten years, plaintiffs argue, the defendant denied plaintiffs’ petition, depriving wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains of ESA protections. The service’s decision violates the ESA, plaintiffs say, because it failed to rely on the best available science – in some instances, the service completely ignored key research that conflicts with its conclusions.

August 13, 2024 – Intellectual Property
Shein Charged With Stealing Creators’ Work for Its Own Products
Clothing retailer Shein, a global and lifestyle brand based in China, has infringed upon countless copyrights by scouring the internet for popular works and then misappropriating the designs to make and sell as its own products, alleges a proposed class action filed in Manhattan federal court.

Shein combs the internet, according to the complaint, in search of popular works created by artists and then misappropriates those works to offer as its own products. Defendant has for years utilized algorithms, artificial intelligence, and related “computerized monitoring systems” to track consumer trends and catch trending and viral images and designs across the web and social media, the complaint says.

Shein then steals those images and designs from creators who support themselves through their creative work, plaintiff argues in his lawsuit. ”Though Shein purports to offer thousands of new products every day, plaintiff says, the company “does not create many of its products” and “certainly does not design thousands daily,”  accusing defendant of running an “industrial-scale” digital copyright infringement scheme at the expense of countless designers, artists, and creators. 

August 12, 2024 – Cybersecurity
AT&T Data Breach Lawsuit Alleges Over 70 Million People Impacted by Cyberattack
A proposed class action claims a March 2024 data breach that affected 73 million AT&T customers was a direct result of the company’s failure to implement industry-standard cybersecurity measures.

According to the complaint filed in Dallas federal court, the personal information of 7.6 million current customers and 65.4 million former customers was stolen by cybercriminals as a result of the company storing the data in a “reckless manner.”  

AT&T customers’ full names, addresses, dates of birth, phone numbers, Social Security numbers, and AT&T account numbers and passcodes are now in the hands of hackers, the complaint says, and this stolen personal information is now available on the dark web. Plaintiff claims in his suit that because of the data breach, “Plaintiff and Class Members must now and in the future closely monitor their financial accounts to guard against identity theft.” 

August 8, 2024 – Privacy
GM Accused of Unlawfully Collecting Data on Driver Behavior
In Detroit federal court, a proposed class action alleges that General Motors Corp. and its subsidiary OnStar Corp. (which provides subscription-based vehicle communication and security services) install systems in certain vehicles that collect information about driving behavior, then transmit the data to insurance companies that use it to increase premiums.

The data, according to the complaint, is transmitted through intermediary LexisNexis Risk Solutions, which is also named as a defendant. The lawsuit, the complaint says, is based on a recent New York Times article describing the practice.

Plaintiffs say in their lawsuit that the information collected included what LexisNexis calls “telematics data,” which itself includes acceleration events, hard brake events, high speed events, distance traveled, time of day traveled, and sometimes location data and GPS data.

August 7, 2024 – Consumer Fraud
Mimosa Hard Seltzers Misleadingly Advertised as Containing Sparkling Wine, Lawsuit Alleges
A proposed class action accuses Molson Coors Beverage Company of falsely advertising its ready-to-drink Vizzy Mimosa Hard Seltzers, given the beverages do not contain sparkling wine as the product label implies.

The drinks’ labeling leads consumers to expect that the “Mimosa Hard Seltzer” that’s “Made With Real Orange Juice” will contain the essential ingredients of a mimosa — sparkling wine and orange juice, according to the complaint filed in federal court in Orlando, Fla. However, the complaint contends, the canned cocktail contains no sparkling wine and is, in fact, made with sparkling water and an alcohol base derived from fermented sugar, rather than grapes.

Plaintiffs say in their lawsuit that the Vizzy product at issue has been the subject of other false advertising lawsuits that similarly argue that the beverage’s alcohol base makes it a beer, not a canned mimosa. This fact is not disclosed as part of the drink’s “statement of identity” on the front of product packaging, as required by labeling regulations, but rather in the fine print on the back of each can, plaintiffs say.

August 6, 2024 – Product Liability
Kia and Hyundai Vehicles Said to Be Equipped with Defective Headlights
Recent models of Kia Telluride and Hyundai Palisade SUVs are equipped with defective headlights prone to damage from moisture and condensation, alleges a proposed class action filed in Los Angeles federal court.

The headlights were manufactured such that they cannot sufficiently seal out moisture and humidity and thus become fogged and/or unfocused, according to the complaint. The headlights, the complaint says, were made with defective seals that allow moisture and condensation to intrude into the headlight assembly, which can cause high and low beams and daytime running lights to become progressively dimmer over time, with the headlight ultimately failing to illuminate entirely. 

Plaintiff says in his lawsuit that the Telluride and Palisade headlight defect is a significant safety hazard as the issue can prevent drivers from seeing at a distance, particularly during inclement weather and while driving at night. 

August 5, 2024 – Cybersecurity
Rite Aid Data Breach Suit Claims 2.2 Million People Impacted by Cyberattack
Rite Aid has been hit with a proposed class action over a 2024 data breach during which the sensitive personal information of roughly 2.2 million people was allegedly stolen.

The lawsuit, filed in Philadelphia federal court, says Rite Aid detected the cybersecurity incident on June 6, 2024, reportedly 12 hours after hackers had accessed its systems using employee credentials. Yet the company failed to notify those affected by the breach in a timely fashion. Plaintiff argues in her suit that the Aid data breach stemmed from the company’s failure to implement reasonable and appropriate cybersecurity measures to protect against “the foreseeable threat of a cyberattack.”

Plaintiff also asserts that Rite Aid’s internal investigation of the incident has not disclosed whether those responsible for the breach have been identified, whether the stolen data was held for ransom, how the breach was discovered, the mechanism of the attack, or what steps the company has taken to protect its systems in the wake of the incident.

August 2, 2024 – Constitution
Academics Challenge Florida Law Restricting Research Exchanges From China and Other Countries
Two graduate students from China whose studies were put on hold have sued Florida education officials, seeking to stop enforcement of a new state law that limits research exchanges between state universities and academics from China and six other prohibited countries.

According to the complaint filed in Miami federal court, the law was designed to stop the Chinese government and others from influencing the state’s public colleges and universities. The countries on the prohibited list are China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Syria, and Venezuela.

Plaintiffs contend in their lawsuit that the Florida law is unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which grants the federal government exclusive authority over immigration and national security. Further, plaintiffs say, the law is discriminatory under Due Process of the 14^th Amendment and is reminiscent of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which instituted a ban on Chinese laborers immigrating to the United States. This ban ended in 1943.

August 1, 2024 – Environment
Gov’t Sued for Allegedly Failing to Manage Nevada National Monuments
The Center for Biological Diversity claims in a lawsuit filed in Las Vegas federal court that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s lack of formal management plans for nearly a decade has left the Basin and Range and Gold Butte national monuments in Nevada vulnerable to neglect and degradation.

Basin and Range National Monument, according to the complaint, covers 704,000 acres 70 miles north of Las Vegas and features unique desert and high-elevation plant communities and wildlife species, along with Native American petroglyphs and archaeological sites. The nearby Gold Butte National Monument is notable for its unique geology and archaeological sites and was established to protect rock art, fossils, and the habitat of the threatened desert tortoise.

Both monuments were established under the Antiquities Act to protect diverse habitats, endangered species, and historical sites, the center says in its suit. It is seeking a court order enforcing the development of management plans as required by presidential proclamations that established the monuments. These plans, the center argues, are crucial for outlining strategies to protect the natural and cultural resources within the designated areas and ensuring their preservation for future generations.

Return to Top

For Additional Postings, Click Here

Editor: Robert S. Want.
Copyright © 2024 WANT Publishing Co.

Services of WANT Publishing:
LegalEditor.com (editing and writing services),
NationsCourts.com (comprehensive guide
to nation’s federal, state and county courts),
CaseFilingsAlert.com (new cases
filed in courts around the country),
MDLCases.com (intro to multidistrict litigation
and listing of pending MDLs).